Eng
 
 
 
 

Projects

 
2012

ILF’s litigation experts successfully represented a major trading company in the Administrative Court of Appeals of the City of Kyiv in an administrative tax dispute with the State Tax Service of Ukraine. The Court reversed the decisions-notices against the company by the Tax Service in the total amount of 20 million hryvnyas.      

The dispute arose as the result of a routine inspection by the Tax Service that revealed tax obligations in the amount of 20 million hryvnyas, which were accrued in consequence of exclusion by the client of bad debts from the company’s gross revenues.

Arguable merits in this case, ambiguous case law on the matter, and the facts that ILF’s attorneys represented the client in a newly initiated action because the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine repealed all preceding decisions in this dispute and the case was ordered to be reviewed by the court of first instance, added to the complexity of this lawsuit.    

Due to correctly established merits in the case and competent argumentation by our firm’s litigation experts at the review trial, the District Administrative Court of the City of Kyiv satisfied the client’s claims and the disputed decisions-notices against the client’s company were deemed illegal and revoked.     

ILF’s attorneys proved that in this case non-repayable financial subsidies cannot not be subjected to taxation because they do not result in acquisition of income, thus, the accrued tax obligations had no merits.  

ILF’s associate Olga Vykhrystuk, under the supervision of the firm’s partner Olexiy Kharitonov, successfully represented one of the largest state owned banks in an action to charge mortgaged property to recover debt under a loan agreement in the amount of  UAH 176 million.

Competent approach to this case and well-coordinated teamwork resulted in a favorable decision by the Commercial Court of the City of Kyiv, in which all the client’s claims were satisfied in full.

The substance of the dispute was to recognize a notary's special execution as one that is not subject to execution. The client found out that the State Executive Service was attempting to sell the client’s mortgaged real estate. The notary’s special execution in the mortgage agreement was done in violation of law.  Due to timely involvement of ILF’s attorneys, unlawful realization of the estate was prevented. The Sevastopol Commercial Court of Appeals declared the notary’s special execution as one that is not subject to execution. This became the ground for termination of execution procedures and unlawful disposal of the property.

On February 16, 2012 the European Court of Human Rights held to award the applicant in Savin v. Ukraine UAH 450.000 for being tortured by Ukrainian law enforcement officers and for violation of his right to freedom.   

Mr. Vyacheslav Savin was represented before the European Court by ILF’s senior associate Andriy Kristenko.

In 1999 a citizen of the Russian Federation Vyacheslav Savin appeared in the Dzerzhynskiy Police Precinct of the City of Kharkiv after he was summoned by the police to do so. Shortly after being “questioned” there he became a handicapped for life. The Prosecutor’s Office investigated this case for more than 10 years. Finally, the statute of limitation established for such cases by Ukrainian law ran out and those responsible for torturing Mr. Savin and violating his right to freedom evaded just punishment.  

In 2007 Andriy Kristenko assisted the applicant with lodging a complaint against Ukraine with the European Court of Human Rights.

In the application to the Court he complained about his arbitrary detention, torture by the police officers, and ineffective investigation of his complaints about the ill-treatment.     

On February 16, 2012 the European Court of Human Rights in its decision agreed with the applicant’s claims in full and ordered an award of UAH 450.000 in his favor.

This judgment will become final in 3 months and the state of Ukraine will be obligated to compensate the applicant almost half a million hryvnyas.

By this judgment the European Court once again discloses serious deficiencies in the investigation of complaints about ill-treatment of detainees being a structural problem in Ukraine.

To see the original judgment, please follow the link to Court’s official website (www.echr.coe.int)

On February 15 of this year ILF’s counsels ensured a victory for the National University of Pharmacy (NUP) in a compulsory eviction dispute.  

This case was complicated by the tenant’s unfounded use of the premises after the expiration of the lease agreement and its evasion of signing the acceptance-and-transfer of the premises act.

The landlord’s (NUP’s) demands to evict the tenant were granted by the court in full due to the well-built strategy by ILF’s litigation experts.   

The defendant’s attempts to avoid obligations under an interest–free loan agreement and to delay the resolution of this dispute with all available procedural means made this a very difficult case. ILF’s legal experts’ efforts to choose the best possible strategy for the trial and to competently draft all trial ​​documents resulted in the decision by the Donetsk Region Commercial Court  to satisfy the client’s claims in full and to award to the client recovery of damages in the amount of  3,139,643, 84 UAH.

On January 25, 2012 ILF’s associates successfully represented a sole entrepreneur in an action on dismissal of a tax fine. After on a routine inspection of the client’s day-today business activity the State Tax Service of Ukraine imposed a fine of UAH 1 039 387,50 for alleged breach of VAT tax laws. The client filed an appeal to dismiss the fine with the District Administrative Court of the City of Sumy. The Court satisfied the appeal claims and rendered the fine to be unlawful and dismissed it. The State Tax Service of Ukraine later appealed the Court’s decision. The sole entrepreneur was represented by ILF’s attorneys before the Administrative Court of Appeals of the City of Kharkiv. At the appeal trial ILF’s litigation experts proved that funds obtained by the sole entrepreneur based on contracts of guarantee were groundlessly recognized by the Tax Service as proceeds, which led to inaccurate conclusions of the tax inspection. Our attorneys’ properly chosen strategy in this case resulted in the repeal by the Administrative Court of Appeals of the City of Kharkiv of the State Tax Service of Ukraine appeal. The decision by the District Administrative Court of the City of Sumy remains in effect.

ILF’s attorneys, under the supervision the firm’s partner Olexiy Kharytonov and associate partner Olena Petrova, successfully represented one of the biggest Ukrainian banks in a debt recovery case.

On 19.01.2012 the Commercial Court of the City of Kyiv satisfied the client’s claims in full in the amount of 133 million hryvnyas. Such a result was attained by ILF’s litigation experts through excellently chosen approach to this case and efficient implementation of all the necessary steps by the litigation team.  

In addition, the court did not satisfy the counterclaim of the lender’s guarantor, the purpose of which was to recognize the legal relation under the  mortgage agreement as terminated.

Due to timely reference to the court, well selected evidence base and detailed strategy of the case, ILF’s attorney Olga Vikhristyuk, managed by ILF’s associated partner Elena Hitrova and partner Alexey Haritonov, ensured the protection of the violated rights of the client – one of the biggest state Ukrainian banks. The case concerned the dispute with an organizer of the public auction in the frames of the executor process.

The dispute occurred in connection with the organizer’s avoidance of the specified in the law of Ukraine “About mortgage” liability to formalize the protocol on the results of public auction that was claimed as “not taken place”.

The circumstances of the case were based on the fact, that the first public auction on realization of the object of mortgage was claimed as “not taken place”. In connection with this the client took his right to buy the object of mortgage at its initial price.

Regardless of this, the public auction organizer did not formalize the protocol according to law, but conducted just the opposite action – repeated the public auction and violated the rights and interests of the client.

According to the decision of the Commercial court of Kiev region from 18.01,2012, inactivity of the public auction organizer was recognized as illegal. Therefore, the organizer was forced to stop actions on the realization of the object of mortgage and execute the liabilities, specified in articles 47, 49 of the Law of Ukraine “About mortgage”.

Competent and timely actions of ILF’s attorneys gave an opportunity to overcome the obstacles on the way to the real execution of the court decision and paying off the debt to the sum of more than 118 mln hrn

ILF’s attorneys Vykhristyuk Olga and Koretskaya Alina, managed by ILF’s associated partner Elena Petrova, defended the interests of investor. The case concerned the recognition of property rights on the object of investment (an apartment in the object of incomplete construction) in connection with initiation of proceedings on developer’s bankruptcy.

Investigation of the case was complicated by attempts of the bankruptcy commissioner – manager of the developer’s property, who entered into the process as a third party on the side of the defendant, to stop the investigation of the case on rights recognition till completion of the case on bankruptcy.

As a result of effectively developed legal position and successfully led legal process, Kiev Svyatoshinskiy regional court recognized the property rights of investor on the object of investment – the apartment.

18 January 2011 ILF attorneys successfully defended interests of the client, who is a citizen of Ireland, with the Higher Specialized Court of Ukraine in Civil and Criminal Cases in case on debt recovery under the construction agreement for the sum over UAH 400 thousand.

The Higher Specialized Court of Ukraine in Civil and Criminal Cases satisfied the client’s cassation, cancelled the decisions of the court of the first instance and the court of appeal and sent the case for new view.

As a result of successfully formulated strategy and accurate legal position ILF’s attorneys managed to persuade the Court in illegality and groundlessness of the decisions of the court of the first instance and the court of appeal.

ILF’s attorney Vykhristyuk Olga managed by ILF’s partner Alexey Haritonov, successfully protected the interests of the client – the largest state bank. The case was examined in the Appeal Commercial court of Kiev and concerned the debt collection on loan contract to the sum of more than 60 mln hrn and collection of mortgage property.

Appeal Commercial court of Kiev left the debtor’s claim of appeal unsatisfied and the decision of the Commercial court of Kiev unchanged.

ILF’s attorneys managed to achieve the complete satisfaction of the client’s claims according to the results of the repeated case examination.

Due to well developed strategy and professional expertise of ILF’s attorneys, the decision of the Commercial court of Kiev came into its legal force, that helped to finish the legal process, lasted for more than a year.

On January, 10th, 2012, ILF’s attorneys successfully protected the interests of a large trade company in the Court of Appeals of the City of Kharkiv. The case concerned a dispute with a tax authorities on the cancellation of tax notifications to the sum of 1,5 million hryvnas.

Although the claims of the trade company were completely satisfied in the Court of a first instance, the case was complicated by extremely contradictory legal practice which the defendant referred to.

However, due to the efficient legal position, developed by ILF’s attorneys, the court refused to satisfy the appeal of the tax authority and left the decision in force, adopted by the court of a first instance in favor of the taxpayer. The client’s interests were represented  by Dmitriy  Lazebniy and Nadegda  Ilyashova, managed by ILF’s partner Sergey Silchenko.

2011

ILF’s lawyers presented the interests of a large international furniture company in Commercial Court of Crimea in legal suit with one of the foreign banks.

The case was complicated by the simultaneous examination of complain on the actions of governmental executive service and of Client’s application on extension of the court decision.

Due to effective legal position ILF’s lawyers succeeded in persuasion of the court to satisfy the application on extension, despite an extremely contradictory legal practice about such a category of cases. Furthermore, the Client’s complain on the actions of the governmental executive service was also satisfied, that ensured a full protection of the Client’s rights and interests.

On November 8, 2011, in the Court of Appeal of Kyiv ILF's lawyers have protected the interests of the client – the Deputy of Ukraine – in the litigation concerning protection of honor, dignity and business reputation.

Representatives were: ILF’s Managing partner - Tetyana Gavrysh, partner of the litigation department – Oleksiy Kharitonov, associated partner of the litigation department – Olena Petrova.

The Court of Appeal of Kyiv dismissed the appeal of the journalist and completely supported the decision of Darnitskiy district court of Kyiv, made on July 11, 2011.

The ground of the Deputy of Ukraine to apply for the legal defense was the untrustworthiness of the information set forth in the article.

Due to the successfully chosen case strategy, the ILF’s lawyers protected rights and interests of the client before the courts of the 1st and appeal instances.

According to the results of legal investigation, the court rendered a decision which found the information set forth in the article of the author to be false and denigrating honor and dignity of the client. The court charged the author to refute the false information he had spread by placing the relevant notice in the Internet publication within one month. Moreover, the court charged the author to withdraw the disputed article from web portal within one month.

Since November 8, 2011 the decision of the Darnitskiy district court of Kyiv came into force and is binding.

This case is one of the several ILF projects on protection of honor, dignity and business reputation.

ILF has successfully defended the interests of one of the largest leading trading companies in the administrative dispute with tax authorities on appealing tax notices on the sum of more than 20 million hrn. in Kyiv District Administrative Court.

Circumstances of the case were complicated with quite controversial legal position. The tax authorities took a fiscal position, which determined the disputed tax notices. In addition, the court practice of this category of cases is equivocal. However, due to profound analysis of the problem, ILF’s attorneys provided the client with a positive result. The Court of first instance satisfied the claim in full.

Thus, due to coordinated and timely actions of the ILF experts in tax law an illegal attempt to increase tax obligations for business entities has been prevented.

ILF represented the interests of a large trade company in an administrative dispute against the Tax Inspectorate as to the appeal against tax notifications on the sum of 1,5 mln. hrn. The circumstances of the case were complicated by quite disputable legal position. Tax authorities occupied a fiscal position, which, as a result, caused the pronouncement of the disputable tax notifications. Besides, there is a different judicial practice on the similar category of cases. Nevertheless, the ILF’s attorneys reached a positive result for their client. The court of first instance satisfied the claims in corpore. Thereby, due to well-organized and timely actions of ILF’s attorneys of Tax Law, another illegal attempt to increase the tax liabilities was prevented.

ILF represented the interests of one of the largest Ukrainian banks in the litigation on invalidation of a credit contract.  According to the plaintiff's claims there were severe financial position of the enterprise. The sum of a credit given to a debtor was about 117 mln. hrn.

The procedure of the case was complicated by the existence of proves about the big debit debt at the moment of repayment, that made the court doubt in the legality of the credit repayment.

Due to skillfully built evidential base and well considered tactics of the legal case, ILF’s specialists proved in the court the absence of reasons for satisfaction of a claim; thus, the interests of the bank were protected incorpore.

ILF’s attorneys represented the interests of “PRAVEKS BANK” (one from the “INTEZASANPAOLO” group) on the stage of an enforcement of the decision concerning several big debtors on the territory of Ukraine. Complexities of the cases were connected with the usage of administrative resource by the debtors and systematic attempts to block the actions of the State execution service. Thus, the execution procedures were suspended due to filing a groundless claim about exclusion of property from the distrait by the debtors to the court. Thus, the court decided to satisfy the claim in the form of delaying the execution process. Nevertheless, due to timely actions of ILF’s attorneys this decision was appealed in the Court of Appeal and abolished. ILF’s experts persuaded a board of judges in illegal acceptance of the decision as to the assurance of the claim and in necessity of its abolition.

Thereby the execution process was renewed and the legal interests of the bank were protected in full manner.

ILF represented the interests of one of the Ukrainian banks in the litigation of debt recovery on the ground of a credit contract on the sum of more than 16 mln. hrn,. As a result, the court held the positive decision in a favor of the bank.

The case proceedings were complicated by the debtor’s behavior, i.e. the procrastination of consideration of the case. It required a timely procedural reaction aimed at negative actions prevention. Because of effective teamwork of the ILF’s attorneys, all the attempts of the dishonest debtor were successfully prevented.

ILF has been successfully presented the interests of the Limited Liability Company with foreign investments “Volvo Ukraine” since 2009.  In august, 2011, the firm’s attorneys won another case on collection of debt due to the contract on technological service of vehicles. “Volvo Ukraine” claimed to the Commercial Court of Odessa Region.  A defendant, motivating the delinquency of debt, referred to unfulfilled repairs by a plaintiff and thus refused to repay the given service. Nevertheless ILF’s attorneys succeeded to prove their client’s full compliance with the contract and law.

ILF’s attorneys represented the interests of a large Ukrainian bank before the Commercial Court of Cherkasskaya region. The case concerned the bankruptcy. A debtor, having necessary property for repayment of credits, illegally initiated the process of bankruptcy. As a result of this, he wanted to avoid the repayment of his liabilities. The complexity of the case was in the fact that the creditor was an affiliated enterprise of the debtor, who was delaying the court’s decision making. Because of successfully built strategy, developed by the ILF’ attorneys, the court agreed on stopping the process of the debtor’s bankruptcy.

On July, 11, 2011, in Darnickiy regional court ILF’s lawyers have successfully protected the interests of the deputy of Ukraine in the litigation concerning protection of honor, dignity and business reputation of the client. Representatives were: ILF’s managing partner - Tetyana Gavrysh, partner of the legal department - Alexey Haritonov and associated partner of the legal department - Olena Petrova.

The court completely satisfied the suit.

A plaintiff disputed the trustworthiness of information, given in the article, in which false information concerning the client was placed.

Due to successfully chosen strategy, ILF’s lawyers have protected rights and interests of the client.

According to the outcomes of the case concerned, the court resolved on false and humiliating information about the client, which was given in the article. The court put an obligation on the author of the article to refute the false information through the placement of the respective notification in the internet during one month. Besides, the court put on the author an obligation to remove the appealed article from the web-portal during one month.

This case is one of the several ILF projects on protection of honor, dignity and business reputation.

On 18th of May 2011 ILF’s lawyer Lina Solovey under the supervision of firm’s partner Oleksiy Kharytonov defended the interests of one of the biggest banks in Ukraine. The lawyers secured victory in case that concerned nullifying the credit agreement. This dispute arose on the basis of credit agreement between the Bank and a legal entity. The amount of credit according to the agreement is more than 116 mln gryvnas. The debtor’s appeal against the decision of the court of first instance was rejected by the decision of Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal.

This case is one of several projects on a debt recovery from the Bank’s debtors.

April 27, 2011 Associate partner of ILF Elena Petrova and lawyer Juriy Jakovlev under the supervision of the firm’s Partner Aleksey Kharitonov, protected the interests of one of the biggest banks of Ukraine and secured victory in case that concerned debt recovery of a mortgage property. This debt arose on the basis of a credit agreement between the Bank and a legal entity. During the recovery the sum of debts came to more than 16 mln. UAH. The debtor’s appeal was rejected by the decision of the Kiev Commercial court of Appeal on April 27, 2011. This case is one of several projects on a debt recovery from the Bank’s debtors.

April 20, 2011 the ILF’s lawyers Dmitriy Lazebny and Olga Vykhrystyuk by the supervision of the Partner of the firm Alexey Kharytonov ensured the victory for the client – Limited Liability Company with foreign investments “Volvo Ukraine”.  The case concerned a debt recovery under  the contract to provide services to repair vehicles . As a result of a successful strategy, chosen by the team of ILF’s lawyers, Kiev Commercial Court recovered from the debtor more than 220 thousand UAH.

Senior attorney with ILF Nikolay Zaytsev under the supervision of the firm's Partner Aleksey Kharytonov acting as the representative of the one of the biggest banks of Ukraine won the case of debt recovery. Attorneys ensured victory in the courts of 1-st and Appeal instances. Kiev Commercial Court held that the debt of more than 61 million UAH must be recovered by a borrower. Due to correctly chosen strategy ILF’s attorneys have supported the decision of Kiev Commercial Court in the court of Appeal. The borrowers claim was rejected.

This case is one among other projects on debt recovery of the Bank.

March 21, 2011 ILF partner Sergiy Silchenko and senior attorney Olena Khitrova successfully defended the interests of the client - the airline company in the Court of Appeal of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea. The subject of the claim concerned non-pecuniary damage caused by the death of passengers in the helicopter crash. The amount of the claim was 500 000 UAH.

After consideration of the case by the court of first instance, the claim was satisfied with the amount of 100 000 UAH. Professionals of ILF began to represent the interests of the company in the appeal procedures. Due to professional experience and effective work ILF’s lawyers had formed a legal position, which took into account the insurance indemnity and other aspects of the case and led to the claim rejection by the Court of Appeal. Thus, ILF successfully defended the interests of the client.

March 15, 2011 leading ILF’s lawyer Elena Khitrova under the supervision of the partner Alexei Kharitonov successfully defended client's interests (Polish insurance company) in the Court of Appeal of Kharkiv region. The case concerned Insurance reimbursement worth over than one million hryvnias. Due to a series of forensic examinations, evidence formation and effective legal position ILF lawyers managed to get a positive result in the case. The Court of Appeal dismissed a lawsuit in a case on the decision of the Kievskiy district court in Kharkiv.

ILF's lawyers under the supervision of partner Alexey Kharitonov, acting as the representative of the one of the biggest banks of Ukraine won the case of debt collection. This debt arose on the basis of the loan agreement between the Bank and the company. At the time of recovery the outstanding amount was more than 370 000 000 grn. The decision was held by Kiev Commercial court of Appeal. This case is one of the projects

ILF's lawyers Dmitriy Lazebniy and Yuriy Yakovlev under the supervision of partner Alexey Kharitonov, acting as the representative of the one of the biggest banks of Ukraine won the case of debt collection. This debt arose on the basis of the loan agreement between the Bank and the individual. At the time of recovery the outstanding amount was more than 14 000 000 grn. The decision was held by Leninskiy District Court of Kirovograd. This case is one of the projects on debt collection of the Bank.

ILF’s attorneys Lina Solovey and Yevgeniy Starikov, under the supervision of the senior attorney Anna Gebeleva, representing the interests of one of the leading Ukrainian banks – JSCB “BASIS”, secured its victory in an administrative dispute on recognition of illegal and unlawful actions of the State Executive Service of the Department of Justice in Kharkiv region.

The dispute concerned an execution of the enforcement record on mortgage agreement during the debt collection of the loan. The Court of Appeal dismissed the debtor appeal against the resolution of Kharkiv District Administrative Court on this case.

Recently ILF represents interests of JSCB “BASIS” in several large commercial disputes.

2010

ILF is pleased to announce the completion of legal due diligence for Agroliga Group of Agricultural Companies in connection with the group’s anticipated private placement offering on NewConnect platform of the Warsaw Stock Exchange (WSE). Being the first Ukrainian company to declare the decision to enter the WSE alternative financing and trading platform, Agroliga Group resolved to conduct a comprehensive and objective due diligence procedure to provide detailed and transparent information on enterprises’ activity.

ILF lawyers assessed the agreements and obligations of the group, examined the companies’ involvement in litigation processes, conformed the permission documents for business activities, and their compliance with national and European legislation.

The project was led by ILF senior partner Olena Kibenko. Legal due diligence resulted in a detailed report comprehended by ILF team, which is to be submitted in the overall package of documents provided by Agroliga Group of Companies for private placement offering on NewConnect alternative platform.

ILF has successfully completed a project on development of a legal mechanism enabling orphan centers to set up rehabilitation groups for handicapped children who live in families, as well as mother and baby groups.

The project has been implemented in cooperation with the specialized orphan center ¹ 1 in Kharkiv. According to the effective legislation, such institutions provide rehabilitation to orphan children, and are prohibited to work with handicapped children living in families. At the same time, specialized orphan centers often don’t use their capacity to the full, which can allow of providing medical assistance to not only orphans but also others in need.

Within the project, ILF partner Sergiy Silchenko worked out the Provision on medical and social rehabilitation groups of an orphan center. The team of ILF lawyers under the supervision of Mr. Silchenko has drafted amendments to the foundation documents and other documentation of the institution which will enable its conducting rehabilitation to an expanded number of patients.

The project was supported by the Kharkiv Regional State Administration and Kharkiv Regional Council. This successful experience is also possible to be implemented in other regions of Ukraine.


ILF partner Sergiy Silchenko and senior attorney Olena Petrova have successfully defended the big national producer of power-plant equipment SE plant “Electrotyazhmash” in the Higher Administrative Court of Ukraine in a case involving the plant’s suit against the Specialized State Tax Inspection for Work with Big Taxpayers related to made amendments to the taxpayer’s record card which amounted to about UAH 2 mln.


The proceedings in the case resulted into partial satisfaction of the appeal, reversal of a prior decision of the Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal made in favor of the tax body, as well as referral of the case for a new consideration to a court of the first instance.

ILF is defending interests of a Ukrainian telcommunication company Velton.Telecom in a debt collection lawsuit filed against it by another Ukrainian mobile operator Kyivstar GSM.

A decision made by the Economic Court of Kharkiv Region in this case was earlier recalled by the Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine and referred for further consideration.

ILF junior attorney Dmytro Lazebny under the supervision of senior attroney Olena Khytrova will  represent the client’s interests in the Economic Court of Kharkiv Region.

ILF acts as legal advisor to the establishment of a private clinic in Kharkiv. The clinic plans to apply innovative technologies never used in the Ukrainian medical practice before, as well as to set up a branch of a specialized higher educational establishment’s department.

ILF attorneys will provide legal support to all stages of the project implementation, including consulting on corporate and intellectual property law issues. The experts will also provide coordination of the clinic’s collaboration with national and foreign medical universities.

ILF attorneys Olena Kolesnichenko and Anton Zinchuk are engaged in the project led by the firm’s partners Olena Kibenko and Sergiy Silchenko.

ILF attorneys have secured a court victory for a big bank which will receive UAH 29 mln as a debt recovery. The litigation turned out to be long-running and complicated since the debtor tried to annul the loan agreements and agency contracts, disputing and delaying proceedings in the case. Consequently, besides the main case, the firm’s advisors handled three more cases on invalidation and termination of the agreements.

ILF team representing the bank’s interests in the court was led by partner Oleksiy Kharytonov and included attorneys Olena Khytrova, Anna Gebeleva, and Dmytro Lazebny.

ILF has been appointed a legal advisor to Agroliga Group of Agricultural Companies in connection with the group’s anticipated private placement offering on NewConnect, an alternative financing and trading platform of the Warsaw Stock Exchange (WSE).

Agroliga Group is the first medium-sized Ukrainian company which declared the decision to debut on NewConnect platform through sale of non-control equity interest and stepped into the pre-offering stage. The listing is scheduled for the third quarter of 2010. The proceeds of the offering will be invested into development and launch of the second phase of the company’s sunflower seed processing plant. The group’s roadshow is scheduled to take place in May-June 2010 in Poland.
ILF will perform a full-blown due diligence of Agroliga Group, advise on structuring of the holding company, as well as will provide legal support while the group's listing on the NewConnect platform. The due diligence report will be finalized by April 2010.

ILF won advisory role to the Institute for Single Crystals State Scientific Institution of the National Academy of Sciences in Ukraine, the country’s powerful scientific center of functional materials development, in its new project on government purchases. In particular, the firm’s lawyers provide legal support in planning and implementing efficient purchase schemes. The work on the project is led by ILF partner Sergiy Silchenko.

ILF advises large retailing Ukrainian company with foreign investment on the acquisition warehouses with total area of 11 thousand square meters in Donetsk.

ILF conducted due diligence and supported the contract of sale of a Ukrainian travel agency. The firm represented the buyer’s interests. At the present time, the system of the company management is being structured.
The contract was supported by the ILF lawyer Elena Kolesnichenko and under the guidance of the ILF senior partner Olena Kibenko.

ILF has successfully defended the interests of the big Ukrainian gas producing company in the dispute with the regulatory authorities concerning legality of issuing the license for development the gas field in Luhansk region. The interests of the company in court were represented by the senior ILF lawyer Elena Petrova.
ILF conducted the due diligence of a plot in Boryspil district of Kyiv region by the order of a big Polish investor. The purchasing of the plot is for agricultural business.
The lawyers of ILF Anna Zhebeleva and Elena Khitrova consult American company in the dispute that appeared with the Kharkiv Customs of the State Customs Service of Ukraine while importation of medicines in the country.
Law firm ILF began advising a major foreign investor for the construction of grain elevators in Ukraine.
2009

The project is implemented jointly with a specialized children’s home number 1. According to the information of Roman Marabyan - the head doctor of the establishment, according to Ukrainian law such institutions doesn’t imply the possibility of working with handicapped children, who are in families. At the same time, specialized children's homes are not always packed, even on two-thirds. Specialized children's homes are under the command of the Ministry of Health. At this moment there is a letter from the office, which is about the principle consent to create groups of rehabilitation for children in families with health problems on the basis of children's homes. The creation of rehabilitation groups should be placed for consideration at the December session of the Kharkiv Regional Council. 


The resolution of the dispute in favour of a bank under the claim about debt recovery under the credit at the rate about 8 000 000 UAH is finished at Commercial court of Kharkiv region. The Decision about the recovery is valid.
Bank’s interests in the litigation were represented by the attorney of the firm Zhebeleva Anna.
Haritonov Alexey supervised this project.

 The attorneys of Litigation practice in the name of LLC “Volvo-Ukraine” perform the row of measures throughout Ukraine, directed on recovery and return of an amount of debts for rendered services and executed works in repair of trucks of VOLVO from more than 35 debtors. On the majority of such cases Commercial Courts’ Decisions on recovery of an amount of debt, penalty fees and inflationary fees were already taken.


Row of measures directed on organization and conducting by Government Executive Office of a public bidding on sale of the real estate on account of credit debt repayment were held by the attorneys of Litigation practice ILF under the direction of Oleksiy Kharitonov.

Senior attorney of Litigation practice ILF Olena Khytrova represented interests of Deputy Governor of Kharkiv region Storogenko S.M. in a case on protection of honour, dignity and business reputation. Under the Decision of Kyiv district Court of the city of Kharkiv from October 13, 2009 the claim was rejected.



ILF attorneys represented interests of Sevastopol municipal State Administration in a case on lawsuit of a private person on adjudgment of illegal inactivity on the non consideration of his application about transfering into the ownership of 4,8 hectare land area, located in Sevastopol, and also about the obligation of Sevastopol municipal state Administration to adopt the application of the grant into ownership of land area , to form the package of documents, to prepare the conclusion and to present it to Sevastopol City Council.
Senior attorney Olena Khytrova, the attorney Anna Gebeleva developed a legal strategy for this case. 
Kharkiv county administrative Court has rejected the claim, by its Regulation from November 11, 2007, and the claim was kept without changes under the Decision of Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal from July 31, 2009 and the Regulation of Supreme Administrative Court from October 28, 2009.



ILF attorneys represented Institute’s interests in a Case on lawsuit of Pharmaceutical Company Open Joint Stock Company «Farmak»   on disclaimer of inadequate information about drug of generic origin  “Epovitan” and about the recovery of 6,5 thousand $ of moral damages.
The firm’s partner Oleksiy Kharytonov, senior attorney Olena Khytrova developed a legal strategy and represented clients’ interests in a court. Under Commercial Court’ decision the claim was rejected and kept without changes under the Decision of Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal, 15 April, 2009, under the Decision of  Supreme Commercial Court, 14 July, 2009.



ILF represented interests of a Large Ukrainian bank  in several lawsuits on debt recovery filed against the Co Ltd “M”. General indebtedness was 16.5 million USD.
The firm attorneys Olena Khytrova, Anna Gebeleva and Dmitriy Lazebny represented bank’s interests in the courts of different instances and held executive actions on this matter. This project was held under supervision of Oleksiy Kharytonov who is a partner with the firm's litigation practice.
ILF attorneys have developed a complex strategy on settlement of such disputes that helped them to attain full repayment of the indebtedness.  


ILF partner Sergiy Silchenko represented the National University of Pharmacy in the court of first instance.  The points of this case were reinstatement in work of a person, dismissed from the position of dean due to the fact of University reorganization, and payment of the forced truancy compensation. The lawsuit had been lasting for the year and a half. The court accepted the defendant’s arguments and adjudged legal and objective decision. According to the court decision the plaintiff’s claims was dismissed.   

INYURPOLIS attorney Anton Zinchuk advised Municipal Company "Kharkiv Regional Philharmonic" during the conclusion of the Agreement on Services with the Acoustic Design Ahnert Firm (Federative Republic of Germany). Among other services the scope of the agreement included the services on development of recommendations to ensure the best possible acoustic characteristics for the Philharmonic's new organ hall. Acoustic Design Ahnert Firm was represented by a world renown expert Dr. Wolfgand Ahnert.
On February 16, 2009 INYURPOLIS partner Sergiy Silchenko and INYURPOLIS senior attorney Evgen Grekov won a lawsuit in the Kharkiv Commercial Court of Appeals where they represented the National Pharmaceutical University. The Kharkiv Commercial Court of Appeals let stand the decision rendered by the Commercial Court of the Kharkiv Region on December 16, 2008 that dismissed a claim of INTERNAUKA Association of Educational Institutions on the recovery of fees for the services on attraction of foreign citizens to attend the University. Hereby, an important precedent was formed for the cases associated with recovery of fees by agent-companies inviting foreign students to attend Ukrainian universities.
2008
INYURPOLIS experts Olena Kibenko (Corporate and M&A), Irina Selivanova (Public Property), and Olena Pelypenko (Corporate and M&A) provided consultations and legal support in privatization of a going concern of Kherson Glasswork. Previously, the Glasswork was leased out to Closed Joint-Stock Company "UKRSKLOPROM". The project was a unique experience for INYURPOLIS attorneys because it was the first privatization of a publicly owned going concern in Ukraine.
Group of INYURPOLIS attorneys under the supervision of Yaroslava Onika, who is the partner with the firm's real estate practice, provided legal advise to a major Ukrainian bank on how to exclude a facility owned by a bank from the List of Architectural Monuments and Facilities Prohibited from Privatization.
Olena Kibenko, INYURPOLIS senior partner, advised a group of Danish investors on optimal investment into construction of  residential facilities in Ukraine. 
Olena Kibenko, INYURPOLIS senior partner, and a group of INYURPOLIS attorneys provided legal support in privatization of Hotel Kyivskyi going concern located in the historical centre of Kharkiv. During the privatization process INYURPOLIS attorneys had to resolve a number of issues associated with the transfer of a business to a new owner (obtaining appropriate licenses and approvals, staff transfer, negotiations with creditors, etc.).
In December of 2008 Oleksiy Kharytonov, partner with INYURPOLIS litigation practice, and INYURPOLIS senior attorney, Olena Khytrova, represented a major Ukrainian bank before the Supreme Court of Ukraine in a case on nullity of a notary's record on a mortgage agreement.
INYURPOLIS attorneys provided legal advise on and support in issuance of purpose bonds by Corporation "VELTON". The bonds were issued to finance construction of a premium-class residential complex in the centre of Kharkiv. The amount of funds attracted by the issuance of bonds exceeded UAH 30 million.

Partner with INYURPOLIS real estate practice, Yaroslava Onika, and other attorneys of the firm finalized the documents that confirmed the right of MTS to use land plots in the Kharkiv Region for installation of mobile communication base stations.
Partner with INYURPOLIS litigation practice, Oleksiy Kharytonov, represented a Kharkiv based development company before a district administrative court in a case initiated by a state tax agency to repeal the agreement on marketing services and to recover damages caused to the state.
Group of INYURPOLIS attorneys under the supervision of Olena Kibenko performed due diligence of MEGABANK. One of the requirements from the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development to open a line of credit for MEGABANK was that the due diligence had to be conducted by a competent law firm.
INYURPOLIS attorneys performed due diligence of a Kharkiv based development company and of the land plot owned by the company for construction purposes. The due diligence was conducted at the initial stage of the investment project on construction of a premium-class residential complex with parking.
INYURPOLIS attorneys performed due diligence of a major medical diagnostics centre "Alpha Medical" (Alpha Medical Ukraine LLC) the facilities of which are located in Dnipropetrovs'k and Kharkiv. The due diligence was ordered by a foreign shareholder of the LLC. Olena Kibenko, senior partner with INYURPOLIS, lead the group of the following attorneys on this project: Olena Pelypenko (Corporate Law), Anton Zinchuk (IP and Contracts), Andriy Leskovs'kyi (Corporate Law), Yaroslava Onika (Real Estate) and Sergiy Silchenko (Labor and Employment). Presently, the firm's attorneys provide the LLC with comprehensive legal support in its day-to-day business activity.
Yaroslava Onika, partner with INYURPOLIS real estate practice, acted as a legal advisor to Construction Corporation "AVANTAZH" in matters of the procedure of commissioning facilities pursuant to the new rules of the Procedure for Commissioning of Ready-Built Facilities that came into force in 2009.
Olena Khytrova, senior attorney with INYURPOLIS litigation practice, succeeded in a lawsuit on protection of intellectual property rights to the trade mark "MASTER+" of the TORGSERVIS LLC. The Kharkiv Regional Commercial Court satisfied the claims and ruled on destruction of the infringing merchandise.


Managing partner with INYURPOLIS, Tetyana Gavrysh, was appointed as a member of the committee established to work on the program for reconstruction of the cultural heritage monuments in the Kharkiv Region. Among others, the following famous monuments were covered by the program: Castle "Sharivka", Castle "Staromerchenskyi", landscape monument "Nataliivsyi". INYURPOLIS attorneys under the supervision of Mrs. Gavrysh developed possible schemes for attracting private investments into the reconstruction of the monuments and development of the adjacent territories (creation of infrastructure for international tourism).

Oleksiy Kharytonov provided legal consultations to the pharmaceutical division of "Johnson & Johnson" on matters of legal strategy in a lawsuit on protection of IP rights to a drug that treats ontological diseases. The claims also covered registration termination of a rival generic drug.
A group of INYURPOLIS attorneys under the supervision of Yaroslava Onika legally supported the turnkey construction project of the "MAMIN DOM" baby goods store chain with subsequent perfection (registration) of ownership rights to the real estate facilities.
INYURPOLIS attorneys (Yaroslava Onika, Mykola Kutsekon) are preparing a legal scheme on acquisition of the "ZANKI" Recreation Center from the State Company "MALYSHEVA Plant".   
Sergiy Silchenko, the firm's partner, won the appeal in the Kharkiv Region Court of Appeals where he represented the Head of the Kharkiv Region State Administration, Arsen Avakov. The Court dismissed the lawsuit on protection of honor, business reputation, and moral damages recovery filed by the Kharkiv Region Council deputies Volodymyr Proskurin and Valeriy Tsurtko. The Court's decision confirmed the fact that the mentioned deputies' hunger strike in the office of the Kharkiv Region State Administration in October of 2006 had the nature of an opinion and not a solid fact that can be refuted.            

INYURPOLIS attorneys prepared the legal schemes for perfection (registration) of a title to use subsoil for mining operations by quarrying on the territory of Barvinkivskyi District in the Kharkiv Region (total area of the plot is 15 hectares). The project is supervised by INYURPOLIS partner Yaroslava Onika.

INYURPOLIS attorneys (Olena Kibenko, Yaroslava Onika) participated in preparation of the Temporary Regulations by the Kharkiv Regional Council "On Organization of Tenders for Investment into Social and Cultural Real Estate Development Projects in the Kharkiv Region and on Acquisition of Ownership Rights by Investors to Existing Real Estate Municipal Facilities". The Regulations govern the procedures of organization of tenders for investment into development of social and cultural real estate projects in the Kharkiv Region funded with non-budget moneys obtained from private investors.
INYURPOLIS attorneys Yaroslava Onika, Iryna Selivanova, and Olena Parkhomenko provided legal support in leasing of the going concern of the Municipal Trading and Public Catering Company "YUNOST -92" to a staff-managed company. A procedure of this nature was executed in Kharkov for the first time.  
INYURPOLIS attorneys Olena Kibenko, Iryna Selivanova, and Yaroslava Onika provided legal support in conclusion of the Agreement on Lease of the International Kharkiv Airport. The firm represented the Lessee of the facility. Presently, INYURPOLIS attorneys render comprehensive assistance with reconstruction and restructuring of the Airport due to its transfer into lease.
Yaroslava Onika provided consultations to Construction Company "VELTON" on the procedure for entering into land lease agreements in 2009. The changes to the procedure of land lease were entailed by the amendments to the Land Code of Ukraine.

INYURPOLIS real estate partner Yaroslava Onika and the firm's attorney Mykola Kutsekon designed a scheme to change the purpose designation (zoning) of a forest land plot on which a sport camp is located. The total area of the plot is 5 hectares.
INYURPOLIS litigators supervised by Oleksiy Kharytonov who is a partner with firm's litigation practice, represented Closed Joint-Stock Company "ÒEC-3" in commercial courts of all the instances in a lawsuit filed against the Kharkiv City Council to recover the debt in the amount of USD 2,887,712.
INYURPOLIS of counsel Iryna Selivanova and partner Sergiy Silchenko who is in charge of the firm's labor & employment practice were appointed to the workgroup of scholars of the Yaroslav Mudryi National Law Academy to participate in drafting of the new version of the Act of Ukraine "On Higher Education". The new Act is being developed by the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine due to Ukraine's joining the Bolognese Charter.
INYURPOLIS litigators supervised by Oleksiy Kharytonov, partner with the firm's litigation practice, represented Closed Joint-Stock Company "ÒEC-3" in the Commercial Court of the Kharkiv Region in a debt recovery case suit (debt amount - USD 7,166,606).

In June of 2008 a group of INYURPOLIS attorneys under the supervision of Yaroslava Onika, who is a partner with INYURPOLIS real estate practice, provided legal support with perfection (registration) of a title to a non-residential facility the total area of which is 15,000 square meters The total cost of the facility is approximately USD 6 million.

INYURPOLIS attorneys Olena Kibenko, Iryna Selivanova, Yaroslava Onika, Mykola Kutsekon, and Akop Vardanyan were appointed to a workgroup to finalize the new version of the Air Code of Ukraine. The presented draft contains provisions that introduce fundamentally new approaches to the regulation of air transportation.

Yaroslava Onika and a group of INYURPOLIS attorneys provided legal support to the Medical Centre "RADUGA" in obtaining of the required construction permits and licenses, and perfection (registration) of ownership rights to the facilities of the Medical Centre.  
INYURPOLIS attorneys finalized due diligence of YURINCOM INTER - one of the largest publishers of legal literature in Ukraine. The due diligence was ordered by foreign shareholders (Poland, Switzerland). Olena Kibenko, senior partner with INYURPOLIS, supervised the group of attorneys involved in the project (Sergiy Silchenko, Yaroslava Onika, Olena Khytrova, Anton Zinchuk, Olena Pelypenko, Olena Parkhomenko and Iryna Selivanova).
Yaroslava Onika, partner with INYURPOLIS real estate practice, and a group of INYURPOLIS attorneys provided consultations and legal support in perfection (registration) of a title to a land plot designated for construction purposes, obtaining the permits and licenses required for construction, and in commissioning of the residential complex "Usad'ba Chernyshova" (Kharkiv). The total area of the complex is 7,500 square meters (project budget - UAH 7 million).
Oleksiy Kharytonov, partner with INYURPOLIS litigation practice, and INYURPOLIS senior attorney, Olena Khytrova, represented the local self-governance authority of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea in a local administrative court and in an appellate administrative court in the case on nullity of the decision by that authority on allocation of the land plot of total area 4.8 hectares located in a costal zone.
INYURPOLIS attorney Mykola Kutsekon provided legal support in conclusion of an agreement between state authorities and land plots owners on transfer of the land plots to the reserved lands fund. The total area of the transferred land plots constituted more than 100 hectares.
INYURPOLIS senior attorney, Olena Khytrova, represented a major insurance company before a Kharkiv local court in a lawsuit filed by an individual to recover insurance compensation in the amount of USD 183,334.
2007
INYURPOLIS attorneys represented a state military company in a lawsuit on protection of IP rights to the patented technical solutions against their unauthorized usage in a drill mechanism that caused damages in the amount of UAH 1.3 million. The firm's attorneys in close cooperation with a patent attorney performed extensive research of the matter, including the claim, to ensure the positive outcome of the case for our client.
INYURPOLIS partner Oleksiy Kharytonov represented shareholders of a major Ukrainian development company in a number of lawsuits about the disputes between the shareholders and between the shareholders and the state registrar of securities. Litigation strategy implemented by the firm's litigators allowed to prevent a hostile takeover of our clients' company.
INYURPOLIS attorneys participated in the due diligence of the Ukrainian National Lottery  - the second largest state lottery in Ukraine. The due diligence was conducted in cooperation with the Czech law firm Rowan Legal. The following INYURPOLIS attorneys were involved in the project: Olena Kibenko, Olga Sin, Olena Pelypenko, Olena Chabanovska, Iryna Danylenko, Sergiy Turchyn, Sergiy Andriyenko.
INYURPOLIS attorneys represented the Head of the Kharkiv Region State Administration (Governor) in the lawsuit versus the Kharkiv Regional Council on recognition of the decision by the Council to impeach the Governor as null and void. The Supreme Court of Ukraine issued an unprecedented decision in which it supported our attorneys' position on the illegality of the decisions by the self-government authorities that were made with violations of the set procedure. 
INYURPOLIS attorneys legally assisted Vadim Mulerman with the foundation of the Musical Theater in which young talented artists of the Kharkiv Region will study singing, choreography, and acting. Vadim Mulerman was born in Kharkiv. He is an Honored Artist of the Russian Federation and Ukraine. Starting from 1989 Vadim Mulerman lived and worked in the United States where he created a musical theater for children in Florida. In 2003 he returned to Kharkiv.
Olena Kibenko provided legal support to the State Enterprise plant "Electrotyazhmash" in conclusion of agreements on export of turbo generators to India and Kazakhstan.

INYURPOLIS attorneys represented a Ukrainian debtor during the preparation of a loan agreement with a Czech bank for the loan amount of 15 million Euros.

2006
INYURPOLIS attorneys represented a central executive authority in the Kharkiv Region in a lawsuit on reinstatement of employment of its former senior official. To represent the Client in this case the firm's attorneys had to expensively research numerous legal issues on the application of contradictory internal rules. The decision in this lawsuit was made in favor of our Client and subsequently confirmed by the Appellate Court and the High Administrative Court of Ukraine.
INYURPOLIS attorneys consulted the Russian Airline "SIBIR" on the strategy in a lawsuit  against the Defense Ministry of Ukraine to recover damages in the amount of USD 16 million caused by the crash of TU-134 airbus owned by the Client.
The firm's attorneys represented the Kharkiv City Council in a lawsuit on nullity of a decision by the Executive Committee of the Kharkiv City Council. That decision approved the new tariffs for housing services. The case was complicated because an extensive research had to be performed to check if the client complied with the procedure on monitoring a regulatory influence of the passed decision upon public relations. A first instance court completely rejected the suit. 
INYURPOLIS attorneys represented a national gas-transport company in a bankruptcy of one of the major companies in the field. Based on the strategy designed by the firm's attorneys, an amicable agreement was entered into by the parties. Pursuant to that agreement the debtor assumed obligations to repay the debt by monthly installments. The amount of the debt constituted UAH 10 million.
INYURPOLIS defense attorney Yuriy Vyshnevetskyi defended the Chief Doctor of the Kharkiv Regional Specialized Orphanage No. 1 Roman Marabyan, who was prosecuted for fraud and accompliceship in illegal adoption of Ukrainian children by US families. 
INYURPOLIS attorneys Oleksiy Kharytonov, Yaroslava Onika and Sergiy Silchenko have been appointed to draft the new Rules for Kharkiv City Development. The Rules will regulate the procedure of planning and development of land, zoning and perfection (registration) of titles to land plots in Kharkiv.
2005
INYURPOLIS attorneys represented a major state military company during the enforcement of the judgment on reimbursement of UAH 800 thousand. Due to the strategy chosen by the firm's attorneys and a number of successful negotiations with the debtor, the amount of the debt was refunded in full. 
INYURPOLIS attorneys represented a state military company  in a lawsuit to recover from that company damages caused by improper execution of obligations pursuant to the additional agreement to the main agreement. The case was complicated by the necessity to carry out a number of forensic examinations and to research numerous legal contradictions on the qualification of the additional agreement as a novation. Precedent court decisions were subsequently approved by the Supreme Court of Ukraine. 
INYURPOLIS attorneys Olena Kibenko and Denys Bugay legally supported the change of name and registered office of an insurance company after 50% of its shares were acquired by the Mariupol Metallurgical Plant named after Il'ich. The new name of the insurance company is "Il'ichyovskaya" and the new registered office is located in Kyiv.
INYURPOLIS partners Tetayana Gavrysh and Olena Kibenko consulted the Head of the Kharkiv Region State Administration, Arsen Avakov, in matters related to the transfer of his business under the management of a foreign trust company. 
INYURPOLIS attorneys Olena Kibenko, Iryna Selivanova, Yaroslava Onika, Svitlana Krutorogova, and Oleksiy Makarenko provided legal support in acquisition and reconstruction of the facilities allocated for a shopping and entertainment center. To implement the project the firm's attorneys drafted a number of agreements and local acts necessary for the Center to operate and are continuing to ensure its day-to-day business activity.
The Firm's attorneys represented the Kharkiv City Council in a lawsuit on nullity of a decision by the Executive Committee of the Kharkiv City Council. By that decision the Executive Committee approved the new tariffs for housing services. The case was complicated because of an extensive research had to be performed  to check if the client complied with the procedure for monitoring a regulatory influence of the passed decision upon public relations. A court of the first instance completely rejected the suit.
2004
INYURPOLIS attorneys represented a national state military defense company in a court dispute with the State Company "Ukrspetsexport" to recover damages in the amount of UAH 11 million caused by the failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the Foreign Economic Contract on Defense Sale. This case was complicated by the work with confidential information that made it necessary to conduct special procedural actions to collect evidence. In addition, the firm's attorneys acted as arbiters on behalf of the Client before the arbiters that represented the State Company "Ukrspetsexport" during the pre-trial negotiations.  
Starting from 1999 until 2004 INYURPOLIS Law Firm represented a national gas-transport company and its branches in numerous sophisticated debt recovery cases to collect debts for gas transportation services. Such cases were complicated by circumstances because of which the firm's attorneys had to substantiate to the courts the amounts of the debts the term of which had expired. Overall, we represented this Client in more than 400 cases and succeeded in collection of about UAH 162 million.
A group of attorneys under the supervision of the firm's partner Yaroslava Onika legally supported the execution of licensing documentation, perfection (registration) of the title to use the land plot for construction, and the commissioning of the Resedential Complex "Sadovaya Gorka", the total area of which is 30,000 sq. meters. The price of the project constituted USD 30 million.
INYURPOLIS attorneys under the supervision of Olena Kibenko - senior partner with the firm, legally supported the acquisition of 50% of shares of the Kharkiv based Insurance Company "Strahovaya Zashita" by the Mariupol Metallurgical Plant named after Il'ich. Our firm represented the buyer in this transaction.